Clouds over the forecast, near normal monsoon, new categorisation is confusing

On Monday the Indian metrological department predicted near normal Southwest monsoon rainfall this year is known as it down plate the impact of the Nino weather phenomenon.

the Indian metrological department for caste deviates from that of private forecasting company, sehmat weather which on April five predicted a below normal monsoon about 93% of the long periods average.

wilder IMD prediction in near normal and oil distributed monsoon should have made the country happy its new categorisation near normal has led to the dispute in some quarters.

while senior meet officials have downplayed the issues saying there is no much difference between near normal and normal monsoon, two important questions are being raised.
Fast if there is no difference is why did the IMD come up with a new category specially in a pole year?

secondly is the agency trying to leave itself with a wrinkle room in case it's prediction goes wrong??

Adding to the confusing is another aspect of the prediction.

There is a moderate chance of a below normal monsoon. this year's all understandable because forecasting the monsoon remains a difficult job, specially S4 in every 10 monsoons are classified as abnormal.
in view of the fact that monsoon is an important factor in India's economic and social life the IMD should have kept the categorisation state forward.

while everyone in India is obsessed with the movement of the monsoon what open get overlooked is harvest harvest this gift of nature. in a country where two third of the field leg irrigation and groundwater is fast deflating there is hardly much being done to as the late environmentalist open set catch water for its falls, along with Prakash Singh award energy is contradiction time and effort must be invested in Conserving the Bounty.

the Indian government master also increased in weather prediction capabilities which remain pool without investment on three front frequent supercomputing upgrades an increase in weather observation data and its significance best in significant scientific manpower.

after all as a scientist at the national Centre for medium range weather forecasting told the Mint news for last year.

7 billion people for changing the climate it is hard for a few hundred scientist to keep pace with it.

In fact even the Incy Wincy Spider in our nursery rhyme never give up and climb the wall again

All we need to learn from them is to never give up.

any kind of negative force should not overpower the strength that we have got within ourselves.

We might have had our dreams crossed been rejected in school play audition criticized for embarking on a new venture, turned down after an interview for experienced a feeding relationship.

Whenever we are rebuffed it feels like a puncture in the heart.
We questions our self worth but we should not treat it as a setback.

We open link a rejection personality, crimping our morale.
but we need to build a sense of individuality and accept that we are different from the rest.
Our identity cannot be defined by their judgement and rejection.
all we need is to went out our emotions and get done with it.
letting the negative thoughts in our head causes our growth and setter our confidence to try again.

We cannot always live in luxury and we all are bound to face rejection in life.
how we can make a comeback take lesson from the past and took forward to the forthcoming opportunities with a sparkle in eyes and twice the genes to change the dream once again.

We should look forward to opportunity with twice the zeal

The earth does not forget to Bloom again even when it is better with a Stormy winds and copious rains.

The the losing political party does not seat and two internal its thumbs but fight again.

In the cause of peace Jadhav must not die

He is hanging will not solve any end of Justice. What such an act will definitely multilate the ends of peace.

This age of course and anti death sentence position.

Let's eat be noted for a start that he is a list crime is SP launch border goatherds, travellers digitas any office or vulnerable.

Kulbhushan Jadhav is us.

any of us can get picked up for doing what anyone outside on domiciled as that is to see here and share what has been seen heard.

But more time anything else for just being in the wrong places at the wrong time.

Jadhav was not event travelling in the wrong place, which makes the prototype many times more vulnerable. Pakistan insist he was spying.

India insist he was not.

Every woman by beach unique priceless.

Euler's theorem MY POINT OF VIEW

THANKING YOU ALL MY GODS.

THANKING YOU LORD SHIVA FOR GIVING SUCH WONDERFULLIFE.

THANKING YOU MOM AND DAD.

                                                       OM JAI SHRI RAMA

This article is about Euler's theorem in number theory. For other uses, see List of topics named after Leonhard Euler.

In number theory, Euler's theorem (also known as the Fermat–Euler theorem or Euler's totient theorem) states that if n and a are coprime positive integers, then

${\displaystyle a^{\varphi (n)}\equiv 1{\pmod {n}}}$

where ${\displaystyle \varphi (n)}$ is Euler's totient function. (The notation is explained in the article modular arithmetic.) In 1736, Leonhard Euler published his proof of Fermat's little theorem,^[1] which Fermat had presented without proof. Subsequently, Euler presented other proofs of the theorem, culminating with "Euler's theorem" in his paper of 1763, in which he attempted to find the smallest exponent for which Fermat's little theorem was always true.^[2]

The converse of Euler's theorem is also true: if the above congruence is true, then ${\displaystyle a}$ and ${\displaystyle n}$ must be coprime.

The theorem is a generalization of Fermat's little theorem, and is further generalized by Carmichael's theorem.

The theorem may be used to easily reduce large powers modulo ${\displaystyle n}$. For example, consider finding the ones place decimal digit of ${\displaystyle 7^{222}}$, i.e. ${\displaystyle 7^{222}{\pmod {10}}}$. Note that 7 and 10 are coprime, and ${\displaystyle \varphi (10)=4}$. So Euler's theorem yields ${\displaystyle 7^{4}\equiv 1{\pmod {10}}}$, and we get ${\displaystyle 7^{222}\equiv 7^{4\times 55+2}\equiv (7^{4})^{55}\times 7^{2}\equiv 1^{55}\times 7^{2}\equiv 49\equiv 9{\pmod {10}}}$.

In general, when reducing a power of ${\displaystyle a}$ modulo ${\displaystyle n}$ (where ${\displaystyle a}$ and ${\displaystyle n}$ are coprime), one needs to work modulo ${\displaystyle \varphi (n)}$ in the exponent of ${\displaystyle a}$:

if ${\displaystyle x\equiv y{\pmod {\varphi (n)}}}$, then ${\displaystyle a^{x}\equiv a^{y}{\pmod {n}}}$.

Euler's theorem is sometimes cited as forming the basis of the RSA encryption system, however it is insufficient (and unnecessary) to use Euler's theorem to certify the validity of RSA encryption. In RSA, the net result of first encrypting a plaintext message, then later decrypting it, amounts to exponentiating a large input number by ${\displaystyle k\varphi (n)+1}$, for some positive integer ${\displaystyle k}$. In the case that the original number is relatively prime to ${\displaystyle n}$, Euler's theorem then guarantees that the decrypted output number is equal to the original input number, giving back the plaintext. However, because ${\displaystyle n}$ is a product of two distinct primes, ${\displaystyle p}$ and ${\displaystyle q}$, when the number encrypted is a multiple of ${\displaystyle p}$ or ${\displaystyle q}$, Euler's theorem does not apply and it is necessary to use the uniqueness provision of the Chinese Remainder Theorem. The Chinese Remainder Theorem also suffices in the case where the number is relatively prime to ${\displaystyle n}$, and so Euler's theorem is neither sufficient nor necessary.