Big tech big government

The code having the hard time balancing the privacy with a traceability but do not forget individual rights.

In India and in other advance society Government and quotes on beginning there organisations with the extraordinary difficulties processed by the present existing sentiment social media and this platform companies that by the operating this media and changing human civilization.

Decisions media on the platform companies surveillance the daily social behaviours of billian of individual reading their male spelling of their social interactions presenting them edited news fields and personalized advertising keeping track of everything they read and watch.

the companies have acquired a breadth and depth of social power over our impulses and behaviour pattern that accept any similar for of influence private or public in the human history.

this is happened in the blink of an eye on time scale of history more than a decade .

for content the first Apple iPhone launched in 2007 voice powered of these technology companies to amplify the human emotions to generate outrage and stop angle 2 channel aggression to move goods and Merchandise leave the more traditional power of laws and government stering deeply and sure how to respond.

India has been both of the Pioneer in this human cost and this benefit of the social media and in this encounter between the new forces and laws.

the supreme court judgement which offering in existence of fundamental right of the privacy states and important fundamental limit on the use of regulations that infringes that right just last month the Kerala High Court recognised that internet access is also fundamental right in our contemporary circumstances.

despite the importance of these and other president judgement the court or also apparently tempted to demand immediate in considered solution to the problems that exercise of these right pose.

in the past week during the hearing of petitions filed by Facebook to call for competition painting in the various High Court including the one in the Madras High Court concerning the linking of social media account of online user with their Aadhar number several observations were made by bags and other Bal justice Gupta observed.

I just cannot get away by saying that would not have the technology if there is a technology to do it then there or to be a technology to stop it.

there have to be strictly guideline but my privacy should also be protected my personal information cannot be entire disclosed just because some police commissioner text for it requesting you to frame the guideline as soon as possible.

search judicial order requiring that government device regulation for rendering traceable all social media activist in order to hold the enormously speakers liable for allegedly defamatory remark some assume that some simple Technical solution can be imposed on the platform companies to solve all the problems that deals and current state of internet.

all the justice Gupta want to protect the privacy unrealistic Expectations of breaking and inscriptions of the having the privacy of this and countable Technology miss understanding and the desired to quickly fix the platform companies under the pressure respect to the privacy Knight of the usual have Intezar into in Encyclopaedia and to the service of the WhatsApp.

because the platform intermediately cannot see the content of the measure it handle it cannot trace a message as it is forwarded.

Re distribute of transferred among the parties.

In regulation required the intermediate accompanies to render the message trustable destroy the parties enormity will inevitable you also break the company's long double attempt protect all the confidentiality of future conversation.

9 the order of demanding the traceability regulation consistent with this quotes on decision.

the puttaswamy judgement specifically talk about how the privacy postulate a bundle of entitlement and the interest that include in the enormity Elo which was encroached upon the privacy will have to with stand this Touchstone of the permissible restriction of fundamental right.

regulation that a comprehensive will destroy this university and the society of our Communications all social media or not reasonable restrictions of that is fundamental right. if the Kerala High Court view this internet access is a fundamental right is correct it is also implies that this site cannot be conditions upon the acceptance of privacy in every date they regulate limitations such as requiring account to be associated with Aadhaar number this will be disappropriate and unreasonable.

moreover it is hardly appropriate to regarded platform companies powerful as they all other sources of the problems of the social media misuse all the world largest democratic including the Brazil and United State as well as India have expressed the settlement of the transformations of the political companies practices in the last half decades.
political parties and other actors adopted large scale formation in French company is best around the effects of social media messaging.

recent Global report of this computer additional propaganda published by the Oxford University research shows this comparative sophisticated and the intensity of the government save the control public opinion by this means

treating the problems of social media misuse S3 E12 primarily a problems of the private defence and that cannot be fully result by the regulator of the platform companies ignore the much larger problem that was refused by the government political parties and their supporters this cannot be remedies by strengthening individual right and limitation government power not By The Reverse. the problems of face or edge complex as the changes about technology has wrought.

There are no simple answers for quick fixes quick and sympathy size with this frustrations of justice Gupta with this Smartphone but the impulsiveness by the court and the regulations will be self defeating it will not be solved problem it will only add another layers and through the twins outrage of the derivation that social media is most important negative contribution to democracy in our time.