never was there a time when I did not exist no you know all this king no in the future shall any offers cease to be

Katha Upanishad as well as in the field that the supreme personality of godhead is container of on removal living entity in the term of their different situation according to the individual work the reaction of the work.

the supreme personality of godhead is also by his person alive in the heart of living entities.

only the recently person who can see within the without the same supreme court can actually it and to perform and eternal peace.

same Vedic truth given to original age is given to all the person in the world whose and pull themselves as a very learnt but a pretzel but a pool poor of knowledge.

the lord's is clearly that he himself original and all king aur assembled on the battlefield or external individual being and that the lord is internally the maintenance of the individual living entities both in the air conditioned and in their liberated situation.

the supreme personality of godhead supreme individual person the lord eternal associate and all the king assembled they are all individual eternal person it is not they did not exist in the visit in the past and it is not that they will not remain eternal person.

Hindi music it existed in the past and their individuality will continue in the future without interruption.

Therefore there is no cause for implementation for anyone.

the mayawati that after the liberation of the individual supported by the court will merge into the in personal daman and Diu it's in the with resistance is not supported here in by lord Krishna the supreme authority.

9 is a theory that we only think of individuality in the conditioned state supported herein is not clearly says there is the future also the individuality of the lord and other as it is confirmed in the earth would continue eternally.

this statement of the Krishna is authoritative because the Krishna cannot be subject to realisation that individual not on the fact that Krishna would have not be stressed it so much even for the future the myopathy argued that the individual is spoken in the question is not a spiritual but the material is accepted in the argument that the individual is material that how can I want to distinguish Krishna individuality.

Age count from 30 individuality in many ways and impersonal daman has been declared to be subordinate to him.

Krishna has maintained institutional individuality in many ways and impersonal daman was been declared to be subordinate to him.Krishna has maintained spiritual individual all-around accepted as a ordinary conditions sold in the individual subconsciousness then his bhagwat Geeta has no value at scripture.

a common man with all the four defect of human it is unable to reach that which is worth hearing.

Geeta age above such a literature no mundan book compared with bhagwat Geeta when one except Krishna as one ordinary man the gita loses all importance.

the mayawati argued that the plurality mentioned in the verses in the conventional and that is referred to the body. Bhojpuri vs to which passes search is bodily concept is already condemned.

after containing the bodily conception of the living entities how was it possible for the Krishna to place a conventional to person on the body again?

their individuality is maintained on spiritual grounds and is the age confirmed but a great idea like Sri ramanujar and others.

it is clearly mentioned in many places in guitar and that is spiritual individuality is understood by those who are the beauty of the lord.

do Jo aur MBBS of Krishna age supreme personality of the godhead have no access to the great literature.

turn on duty approach to the teaching of the guitar is something like that all of the liking on the bottle of honey one cannot have a taste of honey unless  open the bottle .

similarly the mysticism of the bhagavad-gita can be understood only by devotees friend no one else can taste it.

as it is stated in the 4th chapter of the book 9 can be guitar with just by person who can be the very existence of the lord.

therefore the mayawati expansions of the guitar is a most misleading representation of the whole truth.load Chetan has forbidden aaj to read the comments and made by mayawati and one that one who takes to such an understanding of the mayawati village losers all power to understand the real mystery of the gita.

if individual tere pass to the empirical universe and then there is no need of teaching by the lord the plurality of the individual soul and of the lord is an external fact and it is confirmed by the Vedas as above mentioned.