Relations with Pakistan cannot be normalised so long as a teenage responsibility for sponsoring terrorism against India.
no meaningful dialogue can take place if it does not have support for jihadi organisation active in Jammu and Kashmir.
The claim that it is only giving moral and diplomatic support to the freedom fighters and not terrorist in Jammu and Kashmir or even that extremist violence in Kashmir is a result of India's policy future and its human right violation.
if it continues to believe that by accusing India after or activist and activities in Pakistan including the Peshwa School attack and the presenting Duniya to the United Nation will shift attention away from its own conduct and make the debate on terrorism in the subcontinent less one sided.
It will not make the policy changed required to open a dialogue with India.
Pakistan anti terrorism credential are hollow.
despite excitation from many quarter it has not tried those responsible for Mumbai massive terrorist attack.
it allows Hafiz Saeed UN UN designated terrorist to export Hardy Venom against India. It has not proceed against those responsible for the Pathankot attack despite and President Indian Corporation.
Pakistan has also used China to block the designation of Masood Azhar as an international terrorist by the UN Security Council.
Imran Khan the Pakistan Prime Minister and his government has allowed the ordinance that listed Hafiz hired Jamat Ud dawah and wala insaaniyat Foundation both on the United Nation terrorist list as bend outfit to lapse.
it's enough inscription on the grey list of the financial action task force has not induced Pakistan to without terrorist organisation from its well despite sit direct financial situation.
the mounting radicalisation of Pakistani society reflected in the demonstrations of the street power of extremist outfit in the looking down Islamabad in 2017 and forcing the government and against Indian Indian and Asian Anti Terrorist group the mainstreaming of extremist parties in this last elections and the Islamic essence of all the study CA report will be future and relations will be with Pakistan and it may be broken or maybe simultaneously conjugated.
India is right in insisting that dialogue and terrorism cannot coexist.
Previous dialogue around have been disrupted by terrorist attack in 2008 after Mumbai .
Despite our delinking dialogue from terrorism in 2009 at terrorist group it also be abundant to talk.
George calling for an uninterrupted and uninterruptible dialogue a formula now appropriated by the Pakistan should explain how any government can protocol justify wife and the Indian citizen get killed in across the border attack.
search a policy would also imply that India has no answer to Pakistan Sikh state sponsored terrorism and oats food politically legitimate at its use to negotiated instrument against the India.
the example of the US batana talk in the interest rates because I am like as the US is not fighting for its terrorism and the integrity.
it was raining withdrawal from this distance conflict and the while talking it was raining the bomb on the Vietnam.
dialogue cannot resolve the problem at the Israel Palestine conflict the Russia Japan tourist destructive effects Northeast Cyprus issue and other on border differences with China showcase.
several on successful round of negotiations while held on the Kashmir even before this composite dialogue in 1997. a new round will also fail without Pakistan abandoning its academic hostility towards India.
A change in government in Pakistan does not mean a change in Pakistan and trade policies towards India.
Imran Khan the prime minister of Pakistan has not campaign for improvement relationship with India in his Political career.
rather he left this Nawaz Sharif the former prime minister of Pakistan for friendly over tuned the to add this India.
Imran Khan closeness to the army main the greater limit on the margin of the nervous rather than this new openings.
head statement on this Kashmir Shabd in this headline calling for the self determination in this accordance with UN solution containing this Human Rights violation there is making many progress in this other respect of the relationship including the trade contigent on the solutions and this Kashmir issue.
not content with this crucial geo-political again to have the direct border with China throughout the illegal occupations of Pakistan occupied Kashmir and denying as continuity with Afghanistan Pakistan 6 for the further changes the status Q at the Indian expenses.
Imran Khan the prime minister of Pakistan on Islamic leading or well established. his call for the resuming political level talk in a propaganda employee to make him look like a peace maker and India A receptionist.
Heena intent making a principal of dialogue after Indian election in 2019.
But to achieve what?
This is the question behind Pakistan Government and Prime Minister Imran Khan. why he wants to wait till the 2019 to act on the terrorism when he can act now and open a road for this dialogue with unclear voice.
the emphasis in the India and Pakistan relationship can be broken up India make crystal finance for this criminal and initiations of the policies to add India eliminate the tourist from this India and its wale neither will happen China will also impeded any possibility breakthrough the Pakistan and India relationship in order to preserve its pricing strategy is Torque in this India and Pakistan.
Jai bjd political issue that China cannot want that Indian Pakistan will conjugate once to other because it can be demon at the strength of China.
Thank you all for watching and reading my blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment